Further searches for Planet(s) X
After discovering Pluto, Tombaugh continued to search the ecliptic for other distant planets. He found asteroids, variable stars, and even a comet, but no more planets.
In the 1980s and 1990s, astronomer Robert Sutton Harrington of the US Naval Observatory, who had first calculated that Pluto was too small to have perturbed the orbits of Uranus and Neptune, led a search to determine the real cause of the planets' apparently irregular orbits. He calculated that any Planet X would be at roughly three times the distance from the sun of Neptune's orbit, highly elliptical, and far below the ecliptic (the planet's orbit would be at roughly a 90-degree angle from the orbit plane of the other known planets).[1] This hypothesis was met with a mixed reception. Noted Planet X skeptic Brian Marsden of Harvard University's Minor Planet Center has pointed out that these discrepancies are a hundred times smaller than those noticed by Adams and Le Verrier, and could easily be due to observational error. Harrington died in 1993, having never found Planet X.
After Pluto and Charon (discovered in 1978), no more trans-Neptunian objects were found until the discovery of (15760) 1992 QB1 in 1992. Since that time, hundreds of trans-Neptunian objects have been discovered. The objects are now recognized as mostly belonging to the Kuiper Belt: icy bodies orbiting in the plane of the ecliptic beyond Neptune, which are left over from the formation of the solar system. Pluto itself is now recognized as being a member of the Kuiper Belt, and the second largest dwarf planet. Pluto lost its status as a planet because it failed to meet the IAU definition of a planet, which would require it to have cleared the neighbourhood around its orbit.